Tell us a little bit about yourself. My name is Alyssa Anderson, and I am an undergraduate student at the University of South Florida studying for a Geology and Environmental Policy B.S. I was born in New Jersey, but since Florida’s been my home since I was four years old, I consider myself more a Floridian. Outside of science, I enjoy world-building, writing, sewing, and reading. I think that’s part of why I enjoy geology so much, because I love creating worlds and making them geologically and scientifically accurate! But not completely, because I am a big fan of fantasy and fiction novels, so a little magic is fun, too.
What kind of scientist are you and what do you do? My path as a scientist leads me towards geology and the environment. Some of my major interests are hydrology and oceanography, but I am also very interested in other roles such as GIS and policy work. I am also beginning an internship managing climate change and climate data in some Florida counties, which fits in with my goal of being an environmental scientist.
What is your favorite part about being a scientist, and how did you get interested in science? My favorite part about being a scientist is the discovery. I love learning and being able to apply the knowledge I’ve learned into real-world applications is gratifying. I could study most any science field and be as happy as a clam because there is always something new for me to discover.
How does your work contribute to the betterment of society in general? My work in my current internship will benefit the Florida county I am assisting with, as it strives to understand and manage climate change impacts. It also gets students and staff involved in their local environment and brainstorming ways on how to solve some of the major environmental issues of our generation, i.e., climate change. Plus, it encourages more students to get into science and policy and I believe having a science background in a policy related field is extremely important for more well-informed laws and regulations.
What advice do you have for up and coming scientists? My advice for new scientists is this: spending some of your free time on hobbies you enjoy is a good thing. Sinking all of your effort and energy into studying without breaks will lead to burnouts and breakdowns. So, please, do take your time and don’t think that more work will lead to more results if you aren’t resting in between!
Tell us a little bit about yourself. Outside of science I enjoy reading manga, collecting Pokémon cards, and playing video games.
Describe what you do. I am an undergraduate researcher. I recently finished a project which involved entering geographic information of echinoderms (animals like and including sea stars, sea lilies, sea cucumbers, etc.) into a database so that we could analyze their biogeographic patterns (how the animals moved through time and space) in the geologic record.
I have done class visits with groups of fourth graders as a part of the Scientists in Every Florida School program to teach them about geology.
Discuss your path into science. I used to want to be a lawyer for as long as I can remember, but on my 17th birthday, I visited the American Museum of Natural History and was smitten with their dinosaur exhibits! After leaving, I was unsure if I wanted to continue pursuing a career in law, so I did some basic research of how much I could expect to make as a paleontologist (to make sure I could still support myself and a family) and decided to commit to the switch. After that, I have been pursuing dinosaur paleontology as best I can!
Discuss other scientific interests. I’m very interested in birds and reptiles, specifically snakes. If I couldn’t study nonavian (non-bird) dinosaurs, I would study one of those groups of animals in the fossil record. I’ve also become quite attached to crinoids since starting my undergraduate degree, so they would be my invertebrate pick!
How does your work contribute to the betterment of society in general? Hopefully, with the echinoderm geographic data that I’ve collected, we can better understand of echinoderm evolution through time as well as how they dispersed across the world over time.
I hope that I’ve convinced the classes I’ve visited that geology is a science that rocks! More than that, I also hope that I’ve made them more curious about how our world works, and to keep asking amazing questions and finding equally amazing answers.
Is there anything you wish you had known before going into science? Mainly, what classes I would have to take. In my case, I had multiple major options, but didn’t look too far into them. I’m very happy where I am now, although I’m sure there is an alternate universe version of me that is going down the biology route.
Have you received a piece of advice from your friends/mentors/advisors that has helped you navigate your career? I’ve gotten good advice about grad school. In particular, I should be reaching out to professors I would like to work with a good while before applications are due.
Echinoderm Morphological Disparity: Methods, Patterns, and Possibilities
Summarized by Whitney Lapic, a Time Scavengers collaborator and graduate student in paleontology. Whitney studies the paleoecology of extinct echinoderms including blastozoans. Outside of research and class time, Whitney is with her cat, Quartz, and can be found tending to her numerous houseplants.
This paper serves as a review of different approaches for and the importance of studying morphological disparity, or varying expressions of physical characteristics across a group of organisms. Since the 1960s, the importance of examining morphological disparity among organisms has become increasingly apparent. Early studies observed disparity at varying taxonomic ranks (e.g., the diversity in a phylum, like Mollusca, the group including snails and clams) while others applied numerical approaches to quantify morphological disparity. Regardless of a quantitative or a taxon–based approach, there is a need for developing some metric to quantify disparity.
What data were used?: While this article does not collect new data, it synthesizes a collection of studies done on echinoderm disparity. Echinoderms, the group including sea stars and sea urchins, offer an opportunity as a model organism for studying morphological disparity. Echinoderms are highly skeletonized and can be abundant and well preserved in the fossil record. Additionally, they present a wide variety of morphologies and are both ecologically and taxonomically diverse. While studying disparity among echinoderm morphologies has significantly helped address some gaps in our knowledge, studying disparity still offers opportunities to explore echinoderm evolution.
Methods: This study reports multiple methodologies and discusses them in depth with their applications, benefits, and caveats. These methodologies include morphometric approaches using landmark-based geometric morphometrics, as well as discrete character-based approaches. Landmark based morphometrics involves the identification of easily recognizable features, such as the point of contact between two plates that can be measured across individual organisms. Landmark based approaches can assist in differentiating species, studying the growth of a species throughout its ontogeny (growth and development), and can help in studying the disparity of a group through time.
Alternatively, character-based methods are often used when fossils are too damaged to do landmark analysis. When continuous measurements of characters cannot be obtained, the expression of a character is divided into categories into which individuals may be placed. This approach presents as a coded matrix in which expressions of a morphological feature would be coded as, for example, 0, 1, 2, etc. as a means of using discrete categories. Realistically, a combination of the two are used in these types of studies. We want to utilize as many approaches as possible. When we obtain comparable results using multiple methods, this is vital in our understanding of and interpretation of potential evolutionary trends.
The variable morphologies and the differences among them can help us explore the morphospace of echinoderms. Morphospace is a graphical representation of all forms of physical characteristics that a particular group can present with. Understanding the morphospace of taxa, and specific regions of a taxon’s morphospace can provide insight into its resiliency and susceptibility to extinction and diversification. For example, we can consider the variable morphologies of echinoderms and how very different morphologies can assist in their survival in different environments.
Why is this study important?: This paper addresses the ways in which echinoderm morphologies and their disparity can be used to further investigate echinoderm evolution. There has been a rich history of utilizing disparity and morphological approaches to study echinoderm evolution, however, there are several opportunities for further study. This paper highlights the need for combining both phylogenetic study and morphologies to gain further insight into evolutionary processes, both those including, and beyond, echinoderms.
The big picture: Understanding disparity is critical to our interpretations of trends in evolution, as well as to the development of methods to test hypotheses regarding the relationship between disparity and extinction events. By quantifying variation in morphologies, we are able to both provide a metric for understanding the degree of change in morphology during the evolution of a lineage and to explore selection towards particular morphologies surrounding extinction events.
Deline, B. (2021). Echinoderm Morphological Disparity: Methods, Patterns, and Possibilities. Elements of Paleontology, Cambridge.
Deline, B., Thompson, J. R., Smith, N. S., Zamora, S., Rahman, I. A., Sheffield, S. L., Ausich, W. I., Kammer, T. W., Sumrall, C. D. (2020). Evolution and Development at the Origin of a Phylum. Current Biology, 30, 1672-1679.
Fossils improve phylogenetic analyses of morphological characters
Nicolás Mongiardino, Russel J Garwood, Luke A. Perry.
Summarized by Sadira Jenarine, a senior at The University of South Florida. She is a geology major and plans on attending graduate school following graduation in the summer. Once she earns her degree, she hopes to work along the lines of environmental conservation and preservation or become a professor. When she’s not looking at rocks, you can usually find her at the local Starbucks making a latte or in the town’s own “Lettuce Lake Conservation Park”.
What data were used: The authors conducted a simulation of 250 evolutionary trees, also called phylogenies, which were used to determine the most accurate method of creating phylogenetic trees. Programs were designed to account for species’ traits, including strengths and weaknesses as well as their ability and likeliness to survive natural disaster, such as mass extinction events, and/or predation.
Methods: This study was completed by testing different phylogenetic inference methods: maximum parsimony (MP), Bayesian inference (BI) and tip-dating. MP is essentially the path of least resistance in evolution; the fewer branches you must jump on “the tree of life”, the more closely related a species likely is. Bayesian inference, combined with tip-dating is a method of dating fossils by analysis that gives a numerical age of the specimen, and then tests whether it is statistically accurate using an equation called Bayes Theorem. These methods differ from a more common technique, ‘node dating’ which determines the age through age constraints that are formed by the first and last seen specimen in the fossil record. These new forms of analysis were tested based on the 250 trees as well as over 11,000 different traits that these organisms share.
Results: This experiment was conducted by testing the results of the length of the simulated evolutionary trees. The graph (Figure 1) measures the accuracy of the placement of the species on the tree among all inference methods performed by testing different accuracy measures, which are measured by using the number of nodes (i.e., the branching point on an evolutionary tree). We see that even with accounting for missing data (i.e., when species don’t have the entire suite of characters used in a phylogenetic analysis), one type of accuracy, quartet-based accuracy, increases proportional to the fossil sample. In turn, bipartition-based accuracy shows a difference in accuracy when there is missing data. This effect is mostly seen when examining tip-dated inference which uses multiple morphological (body shape) and molecular (DNA) data from fossils themselves. Tip-dating is a newer method of inference and should therefore be used with caution, as it is sensitive to missing data, something very common when using fossils.
Why is this study important? Using complete morphological and/or molecular data of fossils, as well as data from living organisms, provides the most accurate evolutionary tree reconstruction. This shows us that tip-dating, which is the inclusion of fossils into the construction of the evolutionary tree, creates a more accurate and precise tree. This study compares its results to those from previous analyses and examines a new angle: accounting for missing data. This is beneficial, because this study helps us understand the limitations of a number of methods, which can help us create more realistic phylogenies.
The big picture: Here, we are learning that using fossils along with modern species, when many studies use just modern species or just fossil species, really gives us a more accurate representation of how life on Earth has evolved through time. Because some of these methods of inference are newer, like tip-dating, there is much room for progress and development. By no means does it mean that new methods should be immediately widely accepted, but that it is our duty to continue to study this new form of inference dating. By understanding how what we have, what we had, and what we lost, we can get a better grasp of the evolutionary tree that we are working to perfect.
Citation: Mongiardino Koch, Nicolás, et al. “Fossils Improve Phylogenetic Analyses of Morphological Characters.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 288, no. 1950, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0044.
Tell us a bit about yourself. Hello, my name is Kaleb Smallwood, and I am an undergraduate geology student at the University of South Florida. My main geological interest is in paleobiology, but I am also interested in sedimentology, volcanic processes, and igneous rocks and processes within the field. Outside of academics, I enjoy role-playing games, both table-top games and video games, with a few favorites being Dungeons and Dragons and Persona 4. I play other types of both forms of game, but RPGs are by far my favorite genre with which to pass the time. On top of my love for video and table-top games, I am a massive anime fan. So, in summary, I am a gargantuan nerd.
What kind of scientist are you, what do you do, and how will it benefit society? As I mentioned previously, my focus in college is on paleobiology, and while I am not yet a fully-fledged scientist, my goal is to enter the field conducting research on dinosaurs and paleoecology after I obtain my PhD. Ecology is the study of the interactions of both biotic and abiotic factors with their individual ecosystems, and paleoecology simply focuses on ancient organisms. I hope to perform research on dinosaur paleoecology, studying their interactions with the environment to better understand their modes of life. In so doing, I plan to draw links between the ways in which these ancient animals lived and how modern analogs survive. In the process, I will be providing scientists and the public with a better idea of how dinosaurs lived, and, by extension, how modern animals live. Paleontology plays a crucial and often overlooked role in our knowledge, as understanding the past helps us better comprehend the present and predict future trends. For example, knowing how climate change affected the world and how it proceeded in the past allows us to understand what a large issue it is today and how it will impact our ecosystems. By the same token, understanding ancient ecological interactions has implications for current ones. Knowing how an apex predator such as Tyrannosaurus rex interacted with its environment, prey, and the carrying capacity of its ecosystem helps us understand how modern apex predators do the same today, for example.
How did you get interested in science? I have always had an interest in science, likely because I aspired to be like the odd and often socially awkward geniuses portrayed on television and in books in my youth. However, my interest in geology and paleontology specifically began in very simple ways. I have collected rocks since starting elementary school and identifying the rocks in my collection (which was very easy since I only ever picked up sandstone, quartz crystals, and limestone) brought me extreme joy. It felt like a unique form of science that only I could do, since I was the only weirdo in my classes interested in objects like rocks. As for paleontology, I was hooked the moment I read my first book about dinosaurs in 3rd grade. Seeing the pictures and reading about the interesting and distinct ways in which these animals of wildly ranging sizes went about their lives was enthralling, and that childlike whimsy never truly faded away.
What advice do you have for up and coming scientists? My advice, especially for scientists coming from minority racial groups, is to believe in your own capabilities and understand your own worth without needing acknowledgement from others. While praise is always nice, alternatively, sometimes people will immediately assume you to be inferior just by how you look. Challenge those biased expectations indirectly through your own brilliance and show that you are just as capable as those around you if not more so. Finally, remember that if you were truly inferior, you would not be in the position you are in.
Shallow marine ecosystem collapse and recovery during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum
Skye Yunshu Tian, Moriaki Yasuhara, Huai-Hsuan M. Huang, Fabien L. Condamine, Marci Robinson
Summarized by Mathew Burgos, University of South Florida undergraduate geology student. Interested fields of study include solar radiation, hydrology, hydrogeology, hydroelectricity, geochemistry, and environmental sustainability.
What data were used? Rich fossil records of ostracod arthropods (the group that also includes spiders, trilobites, and insects), extracted from a Salisbury embayment (i.e., a recessed coastal body where there is a direct connection to a larger body of water) near the coast of Maryland, eastern United States. Ostracods inhabit nearly all aquatic environments on earth; their tiny shells make them look like “seed shrimp”, and they were among the only marine invertebrate fossils with a strong enough fossil record to reconstruct the group’s response to the PETM (Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum), a time on Earth where the global temperatures skyrocketed for a geologically short period of time. A core sample was utilized to study the ostracods; a core is a cylindrical section of the Earth where the sediments, rocks, and organisms within are removed from the subsurface for analyzation.
Methods:A sediment core was dug from the ground in the embayment, and the ostracod content within the core was analyzed for carbon-13 isotope values, to later determine the survival rate of the species during and post-PETM. Studying fossil records of creatures that existed during that time may lead to future impacts on marine life and our oceans future health. Carbon-13 isotopes can indicate periods or events of warmer temperatures when the values trend negatively, so the isotope values here helped identify the stages of the PETM alongside the fossils. The PETM (Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum) is an event that occurred roughly 56 million years ago, and it was a climatic event similar to the current global warming crisis because of prolonged greenhouse climate conditions; however, the current crisis is happening at a much faster rate.
Results:Analysis of the ostracod abundance illustrated a substantial elimination of the shrimp just before the thermal maximum event, followed by a recovery and diversification of the species once the ocean temperature normalized a couple of million years later. Potential detriments of the thermal maximum are the irreversible impact that climate change had on the marine life, primarily due increased temperature and deoxygenation of the water. As deoxygenation spread (Figure 1), only species who were able to move into different areas of the water column were able to survive; those who could not went extinct. Some species nearly went extinct during the PETM but were able to recover and diversify after the event, even potentially returning to a healthy population.
Why is this study important? This study made connections between the PETM and modern climate change that is human-driven, which is extremely harmful to marine life, as the PETM is likely the best analog to the current climate crisis. Effects of modern-day climate change are like the happenings of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. This is an indicator of the importance of the impact humans could possibly have on the ocean in a short period of time, relative to the Paleocene and Eocene Epochs.
The big picture:The recent global warming effects that humans have had on could prove to be detrimental to our existence. This study focuses on the PETM that occurred over a vastly longer time scale compared to the short duration of the current age of industrialization. Humans are essentially replicating an extreme thermal event, that would otherwise be relatively naturally occurring in Earth’s time, but at a rate which is exponentially smaller in timeframe. With the status of the Earth’s oceans warming, we could potentially see the ramifications of eliminated marine species within our time at an unprecedented rate.
Our past creates our present: a brief overview of racism and colonialism in Western paleontology
Summarized by Kaleb Smallwood, a junior undergraduate geology student at the University of South Florida who intends to use his degree to pursue a career in vertebrate paleontology. Outside of geology, his interests include video games, anime, and mythology.
Rather than a traditional scientific study using data and presenting results, here the authors attempt to unravel the racism, coverings, exclusion, and colonialism of paleontology’s past in order to better understand the racism present in the sciences today and how best to go about rooting this bias out.
Since the inception of the discipline, paleontologists have extracted fossils, minerals, and fossil fuels from other lands, often without regard to the Indigenous peoples or otherwise residing there. This results in environmental destruction and displacement, as the scars left by this extraction tear up land and plants, leaving holes where digs occurred. On the topic of environmental devastation, the history of paleontology is also inextricably linked to the oil, coal, and gas industries. Paleontologists have served these industries in the location and extraction of nonrenewable resources in exchange for funding, job security, and support since they began to better understand how and where oil forms, implicating them in climate change. Another form of extraction exercised by paleontologists is that of biological specimens, both living and dead. For example, the several species of the finches (Figure 1) Darwin studied and extracted on his voyage on the HMS Beagle, such as the saffron-cowled blackbird and vampire finch, were pulled from their habitat and sent to Europe. Paleontologists have also participated in grave robbing, removing the remains of Native Americans and Black slaves to examine their cranial structures in an effort to further their racist views that these peoples are more closely related to primates than white people. Many of these remains of people are still held in storage and studied. While the loss of biodiversity from an ecosystem is a grave consequence of extraction of animals, the removal of humans from their lands is also an egregious crime of paleontologists. It is a flagrant act of disrespect to the culture and lives of the people from which they are taken.
There is also the issue of the Myanmar amber trade, from which paleontologists have gained amber for examination in exchange for money that has been used to fund a decades-long civil war resulting in numerous deaths. Measures to limit and prohibit the publication and procurement of such amber have been put in place, but not all are ubiquitously accepted. Scientists are strictly forbidden, however, from publishing on Myanmar amber obtained after the most recent coup in February 2021.
Returning to the topic of museums, scientists often take materials from other countries and peoples for the purpose of education and exhibition without asking, and this colonial way of obtaining their exhibits is cited as a cause for concern. Museums often refuse to acknowledge the methods by which they procure their items, do not credit the places they got them from, refuse to compensate these countries or return their property, have disproportionate wealth and resources compared to other museums, lack diversity in their staff, and pay their staff little for their work. Accountability, inclusion of the voices of the people whose history they display, and a willingness to return items would go a long way in correcting these flaws.
There are also injustices present in the teaching of paleontology. As the authors point out, textbooks and courses in the Americas tend to omit the ways in which scientists in the field have previously trampled upon Black and Native American people. For example, the erasure of their history and the fact that the first known fossils in the Americas were discovered by slaves is rarely mentioned. As is apparent, science has never been the unbiased and apolitical field students are led to believe it is. Furthermore, these courses are often taught by white men, further excluding other racial groups. The power system this creates makes it difficult for those with concerns to voice them for fear of reproach.
Why is this important/The big picture: Underscoring each point in this article is the constant reminder that the challenging task of acknowledging and reflecting on the past and current racially discriminatory of paleontology, the geosciences, and science as a whole, is a crucial first step in resolving those same issues. The writers call on paleontologists to consider whether the specimens they use come from Indigenous lands and ask who truly owns their specimens; they ask paleontologists to consider the people that their research may impact and their role in it, as giving proper credit to the right people without bias or exclusion is a crucial practice in any field, not just the sciences.
Monarrez, P., Zimmt, J., Clement, A., Gearty, W., Jacisin, J., Jenkins, K., . . . Thompson, C. (2021). Our past creates our present: A brief overview of racism and colonialism in Western paleontology. Paleobiology, 1-13. doi:10.1017/pab.2021.28
Summarized by Kale Headings, a senior at the University of South Florida. They are getting a dual degree in geology and environmental science and policy. They intend to study planetary geology or glaciology in graduate school next, and then work as a researcher or professor after they finish graduate school. In their free time they like to draw, play video games, and hang out with friends!
What data were used? The researchers looked at FGF genes, or fibroblast growth factors, from humans, domestic dogs and cats, mice, and other Carnivora genes from GenBank. FGFs affect a variety of biological functions including metabolism and development.
Methods: The researchers searched for Carnivora genetic sequences in GenBank, which is a database of genetic information of various species and confirmed that the genetic sequences they found were FGF genes. They did a phylogenetic analysis on the Carnivora species to determine their evolutionary relationships and the relationships of their FGF genes, using the FGF genes of mice and humans as an outgroup (outgroups ‘root’ the tree). In other words, comparing carnivoran FGF genes to human and mice FGF genes could help researchers determine which FGF genes are unique to carnivorans, and which are present across many groups and species, including mice and humans. Much of this analysis utilized various advanced computer programs and techniques. The researchers referenced preexisting phylogenetic trees for Carnivora and used Bayesian inference methods to create phylogenetic trees that included FGF genes alongside the Carnivora tree. Bayesian inference methods use Bayes theorem, an equation, to help infer which evolutionary relationships between species are most supported by the data.
Results: The researchers found 660 new FGF genes in 30 different carnivora genomes. The phylogenetic trees created both with and without the FGF data were similar, and the FGF genes were able to be classified into 10 subfamilies (Figure 1) based on their locations on the phylogenetic tree. There were positive selection sites for two FGF genes that control metabolism and muscle development in Carnivora, which is significant because these features are important to these animals’ predatory habits. There was also a positive selection gene for FGF19 in the group of carnivora that was semiaquatic, and this is notable because it may indicate that FGF19 helps semiaquatic animals to regulate their body temperature and keep their balance in water.
Why is this study important? The researchers concluded that the FGF gene family of Carnivora should be divided into 10 subfamilies. The researchers also found positive selection for several individual FGF genes that may be related to the diet and predator status of Carnivora animals, as these genes help to metabolize fats and develop muscles. They also found that habitat plays a role in what FGF genes are selected for, as notably FGF19 was selected for in semiaquatic carnivorans, and several other FGF genes also showed a strong relationship with the animals’ habitat types. These conclusions show how FGF genes can be used to further understand the evolutionary relationships and significance of specific evolutionary traits across a variety of species of mammals, since other groups of mammals besides Carnivora also have FGF genes.
The big picture: This study may help researchers better understand the evolutionary pathways taken by earlier carnivorans in the fossil record. In the specific case of FGF genes, these genes contain key physiological processes, just a few of which are metabolism and muscle development. Therefore, better understanding of the FGF genes and how they function across groups of mammals and how they vary due to evolutionary relationships may also help us to better understand our own FGF genes and how they work in our own human bodies.
Citation: Wei, Q., Dong, Y., Sun, G., Wang, X., Wu, X., Gao, X., Sha, W., Yang, G., & Zhang, H. (2021). FGF gene family characterization provides insights into its adaptive evolution in Carnivora. Ecology and Evolution, 11, 9837– 9847. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7814
Summarized by Jacob T. Booe. Jacob is in his senior year at the University of South Florida pursuing a B.S. degree in Geology. Growing up on the east coast of Florida near Kennedy Space Center, science and engineering has surrounded him for much of his educational career. While Jacob’s current trajectory is geared towards Earth Sciences, at the time of high school graduation, Jacob had no clue what his future career path was. Therefore, he enrolled in his local community college, Eastern Florida State College, where he graduated with his A.A. degree. However before obtaining an A.A. degree, Jacob found himself as an avid musician, pursuing the idea of acoustics and audio engineering. It wasn’t until his last year before receiving his A.A. degree that Jacob decided to take an intro to geology elective. After that course Jacob found himself committed to a career in geology transferring to USF in Spring 2020.
What data were used: The research team began withtheanalysis of 719 records of fossil whales, whose first origins are in the Cenozoic Era, across the Miocene, Pliocene, and Pleistocene epochs, approximately 11,000 to 23 million years ago (Figure 1). Researchers also used fossil whale occurrences to supplement their dataset from the Paleobiology Database (PBDB), which is a public database of global fossil occurrences that researchers update with new fossil finds. Along with the fossil occurrences, researchers collected information about the characteristics of rocks (i.e., their lithology). in which the fossils were found, where in the world they were found, and the time at which they lived.
Methods: Researchers created six categories of lithology based on composition and grain with carbonate (like limestone) and siliciclastic rocks (like sandstone); these can be considered to represent the environments they likely have lived in. The skeletal system of the whales was categorized into four parts: skull, teeth, limbs, and spinal column. In addition, each fossil was graded on its quality of preservation. These data were analyzed to determine what relationships these variables shared. Other data, like measurements of the whale bones, were used to determine growth patterns of the organisms.
Results: The majority of whale fossils that have currently been described originated in the Northern hemisphere. The team compared their findings to that of the existing PBDB and found that the PBDB had a more global sampling, with more even coverage between the north and south hemispheres. Researchers note that more exploration for fossils in the southern hemisphere must continue; other areas for further research include West Africa and Antarctica. In regard to lithological findings, results show that whale fossils are mainly found in fine-grained siliciclastic rocks while carbonates contribute considerably fewer occurrences. This differs from the PBDB, where carbonate lithologies had more occurrences than fine-grained siliciclastic. In terms of the growth of an organism, the team compared the fossil whales against the growth of a modern whale, the river dolphin. The results showed that in ancestral whales, skull size increases while the tympanic bulla (an ear bone) decreases; however, modern whales show skulls that increase concurrently with the tympanic bulla, with a special type of growth called “isometric growth”.
Why is this study important: The current information used to study whales and their evolution is incomplete and biased towards known fossil localities in the northern hemisphere. In order to fill in the gap of whale fossils, this study shows some trends towards what environments is more likely to hold preserved whale fossils.
The big picture: In this study, the authors tried to determine the quality and quantity of fossil data of whales. Identifying the gaps in our knowledge, and discovering why those gaps currently exist, can have an impact on how scientists approach whale paleontology moving forward. As the authors point out, places like West Africa are under-sampled, which leads to biases in our dataset. It is critical to determine whether under sampled areas of the world are due to a lack of fossil record or if scientists are not approaching the search for fossils globally.
The scaly skin of the abelisaurid Carnotaurussastrei (Theropoda: Ceratosauria) from the Upper Cretaceous of Argentina.
By: Christophe Hendrickx and Phil R. Bell
Summarized by: Israel J. Rivera-Molina, a senior Geology major at the University of South Florida. He plans to attend graduate school in paleontology in order to start a career within the field of dinosaur morphology and evolution.
What data were used? The holotype (i.e., the fossil specimen that ‘defines’ a species) of Carnotaurus, which was recovered from La Colonia Formation in Argentina; scientists also looked at skin casts and 3D models of various other dinosaur taxa.
Methods: In this study, fossilized skin impressions of Carnotaurus were studied and a 3D model was generated using a camera and various imaging softwares. The skin was examined and then compared to various other taxa of dinosaurs from repositories, museums and other places where researchers keep fossils, from around the world.
Results: The scales covering the Carnotaurus (Figure 1) were found to be different in shape, size, orientation, and distribution. It was previously thought that the scales of the Carnotaurus were the same throughout the animal’s body, but it turns out that that is not the case. On the contrary, the scales were diverse: coming in six different shapes from elliptical to diamond-shaped scales. The scales also differed in textures ,ranging from smooth to granular, and were oriented in more than one way depending on which part of the body being observed. The tail especially displayed scales of a wide array of shapes that were arranged in various directions, while also ranging in size.
Why is the study important?This study is important because it calls to attention the lack of emphasis placed on the research done on the skin of the Carnotaurus. Carnotaurus has some of most well-preserved scales amongst the theropods (the bipedal, carnivorous dinosaurs), yet past articles made little to no mention of the skin of the dinosaur. The authors also suggested that regarding the function of scales, scientists should think outside the box when comparing dinosaurs to extant lifeforms. They encourage researchers to not be afraid to venture away from reptilian analogues to attempt to discern what use(s) the scales served.
Big picture: This research provided a more in-depth look into the architecture of the scales covering the Carnotaurus. This body of work encourages scientists to look at and think more critically about the scales of dinosaurs, not only to reconstruct their appearance, but also to possibly discern some of their behaviors. Whether the scales served as a means of thermoregulation or as sexual display structures, further studies done on scales can lead to a greater understanding of how extinct dinosaurs lived.
Citation: Hendrickx, C., Bell, P. B., 2021, The scaly skin of the abelisaurid Carnotaurussastrei (Theropoda: Ceratosauria) from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia. Cretaceous Research, p. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2021.104994